Submission of a manuscript implies:
- that the work described has not been published
- that it is not under consideration for publication
- that it contains
- that its publication has been approved by all
co-authors, if any, as well as by the responsible authorities – tacitly
or explicitly – at the institute where the work has been carried out.
The publisher will not be held legally responsible
should there be any claims for compensation.
Submitting a paper to Proc in
MS is the authors' option and also their responsibility.
The paper has to be written in
English. Its contents should be structured in the following way:
problem description, application field, research stages, methods used,
results, further research, conclusions, and references.
The paper has to offer the
answers for the following questions: description of the problem, what is
done by other people, what the authors did, what is new, what is the
Figures have to be made
in high quality, which is suitable for reproduction and print.
regarding the paper format and editing are given in the template file
THE PAPERS WHICH ARE NOT PREPARED EXACTLY ACCORDING TO THE
INSTRUCTIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO IMPROVE THE PAPER ACCORDINGLY TO THE OBSERVATIONS
AROSE AFTER PAPER REVIEWING AND TRANSMITTED TOGETHER WITH THE
NOTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE! AUTHORS ARE PART OF THE REVIEWING PROCESS.
We are sure that if you read
the instructions carefully and prepare the paper exactly according to the
instructions, you will have the satisfaction of a good published paper.
We are looking
forward to get your contributions to the journal
Proceedings in Manufacturing Systems.
Please fill in and sign the
Originality Statement and send
it after the paper acceptance.
Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
Publication and authorship
All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review
process by at least two international reviewers that are
experts in the area of the particular paper.
The factors that are taken into account in review are
relevance, soundness, significance, originality,
readability and language.
The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance
with revisions, or rejection.
If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a
submission, there is no guarantee that the revised
submission will be accepted.
Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal
requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel,
copyright infringement and plagiarism.
No research can be included in more than one
Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their
Authors must certify that the manuscript has not
previously been published elsewhere.
Authors must certify that the manuscript is not
currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
Authors must participate in the peer review process.
Authors are obliged to provide retractions or
corrections of mistakes.
All Authors mentioned in the paper must have
significantly contributed to the research.
Authors must state that all data in the paper are real
Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of
Authors must identify all sources used in the creation
of their manuscript.
Authors must report any errors they discover in their
published paper to the Editors.
Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers
confidential and treat them as privileged information.
Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no
personal criticism of the author
Reviewers should express their views clearly with
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that
has not been cited by the authors.
Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief's
attention any substantial similarity or overlap between
the manuscript under consideration and any other
published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they
have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive,
collaborative, or other relationships or connections
with any of the authors, companies, or institutions
connected to the papers.
Editors have complete responsibility and authority to
reject/accept an article.
Editors are responsible for the contents and overall
quality of the publication.
Editors should always consider the needs of the authors
and the readers when attempting to improve the
Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and
the integrity of the academic record.
Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections
Editors should have a clear picture of a research's
Editors should base their decisions solely one the
papers' importance, originality, clarity and relevance
to publication's scope.
Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn
the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
Editors should ensure that all research material they
publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical
Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably
Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a
paper is published or unpublished, and make all
reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution
to the problem.
Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions,
they should have proof of misconduct.
Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest
between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.
Paper submission is free of charge.
For each accepted paper the required publishing fee is of 100 EUR,
complete editorial workflow,
paper processing and necessary correspondence
peer review process,
final checking, corrections and paper acceptance,
proof reading, final formatting,
delivering of one journal copy to the corresponding author,
sending files and copies to libraries
sending files bibliographic services for indexing/abstracting,
dissemination of published papers,
web page updating,
cross-reference linking etc.
The corresponding author will be requested for some additional data
regarding the invoice content. Invoices are going to be sent by e-mail
as PDF files.
The fee payment should be done before paper publishing.